Skip to content
Part of: How-to format
General

BoldlyType vs CoolSymbol: Which Text Formatter Is Better?

BoldlyType and CoolSymbol solve different problems. BoldlyType is a text formatting toolkit with 18 style generators and 17 platform formatters. CoolSymbol is a symbol and emoji reference with a massive browsable library. Use BoldlyType when formatting text for a platform; use CoolSymbol when looking for symbols or emoji. They complement each other.

Shreyas Bagal·Aug 21, 2026·6 min

BoldlyType and CoolSymbol solve different problems. BoldlyType is a text formatting toolkit with 18 style generators and 17 platform formatters. CoolSymbol is a symbol and emoji reference with a massive browsable library. Use BoldlyType when formatting text for a platform; use CoolSymbol when looking for symbols or emoji. They complement each other.

Key takeaways

  • BoldlyType and CoolSymbol both use the same Unicode characters — the output is identical where they overlap, so neither produces "higher quality" text.
  • BoldlyType's edge is text formatting: 18 style generators (bold, cursive, gothic, bubble, etc.) and 17 platform-specific formatters with native markdown for WhatsApp, Slack, Discord, and Reddit.
  • CoolSymbol's edge is its massive symbol and emoji library — browsable by category, one-click copy, with hundreds of arrows, stars, hearts, and decorative characters.
  • BoldlyType includes character counters, caption generators, and accessibility warnings that CoolSymbol doesn't offer.
  • CoolSymbol has no platform-specific formatters and fewer text style options, but that's not what it's built for.
  • The two tools complement each other — use BoldlyType for text formatting and CoolSymbol for symbol browsing.
BoldlyType vs CoolSymbol: Which Text Formatter Is Better?
On this page

Comparison

Two tools, two different jobs

Search for "copy paste fonts" or "cool text symbols" and both BoldlyType and CoolSymbol show up. They overlap enough to seem interchangeable — both give you styled characters you can paste into bios, posts, and usernames. But once you actually use them for a real task, the difference is obvious: they're built for different problems.

BoldlyType is a text formatting toolkit. It takes the text you write and converts it into styled Unicode — bold, italic, cursive, gothic, bubble, small caps, and more — with dedicated formatters for 17 platforms and 18 style generators. It also bundles character counters, caption generators, and accessibility warnings.

CoolSymbol is a symbol and emoji reference. Its core strength is giving you a massive, browsable library of Unicode symbols, emoji, special characters, arrows, stars, hearts, and decorative elements you can copy with one click. It has some text styling, but that's not the main event.

Neither tool is a scam. Neither is "better" in the abstract. They're optimized for different workflows, and the right pick depends entirely on what you're trying to do. Here's the honest breakdown.

The shared foundation

Both tools work by giving you Unicode characters — not font files — that you paste into apps that have no built-in formatting. When you paste 𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗱 text from either tool, the bold is baked into the characters themselves (they're from the Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols block in the Unicode Standard), not applied by a font setting. That's why it survives copy-paste into Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, and everywhere else.

This means the raw output is the same. A bold "A" from BoldlyType and a bold "A" from CoolSymbol are the same Unicode character — U+1D5D4. No tool produces "higher quality" characters. The differences are in what surrounds that output: which styles are available, how the interface works, what extra tools you get, and how the experience is tailored to your actual use case.

Side-by-side comparison

DimensionBoldlyTypeCoolSymbol
Text style generators18 dedicated generators — bold, italic, cursive, gothic, bubble, small caps, monospace, wide, upside-down, underline, strikethrough, and moreBasic text styling with fewer font variations
Platform-specific formatters17 formatters (Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Facebook, TikTok, Discord, Reddit, WhatsApp, Slack, and more) with native formatting where supportedNo platform-specific formatters
Symbol & emoji libraryNot the focus — no dedicated symbol browserMassive, browsable collection of Unicode symbols, emoji, arrows, stars, hearts, math symbols, and decorative characters
Character countersBuilt-in counter with platform-specific limitsNot a primary feature
Caption/bio generatorsCaption generators, bio generators, hashtag toolsNot offered
Native markdown formattingFor WhatsApp, Slack, Discord, and Reddit, generates native markdown those apps render as real formatting — not Unicode workaroundsUnicode-only output
Accessibility guidanceWarns that styled Unicode reads poorly to screen readers and breaks in-app searchNot a stated focus
UI and adsClean, minimal interface; no signupFunctional interface; ad-supported

Where CoolSymbol wins

CoolSymbol's strength is its symbol library, and it's a real strength.

Massive symbol catalog. If you need a specific Unicode arrow, a decorative bracket, a math operator, a currency sign, a box-drawing character, or one of the hundreds of miscellaneous symbols scattered across the Unicode standard, CoolSymbol probably has it organized and ready to copy. You browse by category, click, and it's on your clipboard. That workflow is fast and hard to beat for the use case it serves.

Emoji browsing. CoolSymbol also serves as an emoji reference — you can browse emoji by category, see them all laid out, and copy the ones you want. If you're building an Instagram bio or a tweet and need the right emoji, it's a convenient one-stop source.

Special characters for niche needs. Need a lenny face, a kaomoji, a text art divider, or a decorative border for a forum post? CoolSymbol has those. BoldlyType doesn't try to compete here — it's not what the tool is for.

If your job is "find me a specific symbol or emoji and let me copy it," CoolSymbol is the better pick and it's not close.

Where BoldlyType wins

BoldlyType's strength is structured text formatting — taking the words you've already written and making them look right for a specific platform.

18 style generators. BoldlyType offers dedicated generators for bold, italic, cursive, gothic, bubble, small text, fancy text, monospace, wide text, upside-down, underline, strikethrough, and more. Type once, see every style at once, copy the one that fits. CoolSymbol's text styling is more limited in variety — fewer font options and no way to preview them all simultaneously.

17 platform formatters. This is the biggest functional gap. BoldlyType has dedicated formatters for Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Facebook, TikTok, Discord, Reddit, WhatsApp, Slack, and eight more. Each one knows that platform's formatting rules. For WhatsApp, Slack, Discord, and Reddit, it generates native markdown those apps actually render — so you get real bold and italic, not Unicode substitutes. CoolSymbol doesn't have platform-specific tools.

Character counters and limits. Each platform formatter shows a live character count against that platform's actual limits. If you're writing a LinkedIn post (3,000 characters), an Instagram caption (2,200), or a tweet (280), you see exactly where you stand. The standalone character counter works for any text.

Honest accessibility warnings. BoldlyType tells you upfront that styled Unicode characters read poorly to screen readers (they get announced letter-by-letter or as "mathematical bold capital A") and that in-app search can't match them to the plain word. CoolSymbol doesn't flag this. It matters because a bio full of fancy text can lock out followers who use assistive technology.

If your job is "format this text for a specific platform and make sure it looks right," BoldlyType is the better pick.

Which one should you use?

Use both. They're free and they solve different problems.

  • Formatting a bio, caption, or post? Start with BoldlyType. Pick the platform formatter or the font generator for your use case, style your text, check the character count, and paste.
  • Looking for a specific symbol, emoji, or decorative character? Go to CoolSymbol. Browse the category, copy what you need, done.
  • Building a bio that needs both styled text and symbols? Format your text in BoldlyType, grab your symbols from CoolSymbol, and combine them in the bio field.

There's no reason to pick one and ignore the other. They complement each other more than they compete.

FAQ

Is BoldlyType free like CoolSymbol? Yes. Both are completely free with no signup required. BoldlyType runs entirely in your browser — nothing you type is stored or sent anywhere. CoolSymbol is also free and ad-supported.

Do both tools use the same Unicode characters? For the text styles they share (like bold and italic), yes — the underlying Unicode characters are identical. A bold "A" from either tool is the same code point (U+1D5D4). The difference is in how many styles, platform tools, and extra features surround that core output.

Can I use BoldlyType and CoolSymbol together? Absolutely. Format your text in BoldlyType's text generator or a platform formatter, then grab symbols or emoji from CoolSymbol and paste everything into your bio or post. They work on the same principle — pasting Unicode characters — so they combine cleanly.

Does CoolSymbol have a character counter? Not as a dedicated tool. BoldlyType has a built-in character counter that shows live counts against each platform's limits, plus individual counters per platform.

Which tool is better for Instagram? For styling your bio or caption text with bold, italic, or cursive, BoldlyType's Instagram formatter is purpose-built for that workflow — it shows you every style at once and warns about accessibility trade-offs. For finding emoji or decorative symbols to drop into your bio, CoolSymbol's browsable library is faster. Use both if you need both.

Ready to put this into practice?

Open a formatter

Sources

Spotted an error? Email hello@boldlytype.com — we update guides quarterly and welcome corrections.

Frequently asked questions

Latest questions readers ask us about this topic.

Is BoldlyType free like CoolSymbol?

Yes. Both are completely free with no signup required. BoldlyType runs entirely in your browser — nothing you type is stored or sent anywhere. CoolSymbol is also free and ad-supported.

Do both tools use the same Unicode characters?

For the text styles they share (like bold and italic), yes — the underlying Unicode characters are identical. A bold 'A' from either tool is the same code point (U+1D5D4). The difference is in how many styles, platform tools, and extra features surround that core output.

Can I use BoldlyType and CoolSymbol together?

Absolutely. Format your text in BoldlyType's text generator or a platform formatter, then grab symbols or emoji from CoolSymbol and paste everything into your bio or post. They work on the same principle — pasting Unicode characters — so they combine cleanly.

Does CoolSymbol have a character counter?

Not as a dedicated tool. BoldlyType has a built-in character counter that shows live counts against each platform's limits, plus individual counters per platform.

Which tool is better for Instagram?

For styling your bio or caption text with bold, italic, or cursive, BoldlyType's Instagram formatter is purpose-built for that workflow — it shows you every style at once and warns about accessibility trade-offs. For finding emoji or decorative symbols to drop into your bio, CoolSymbol's browsable library is faster. Use both if you need both.

The sub-questions readers ask next — answered, with where to go.

LinkedIn's post box — used for feed posts, comments, your headline and your About section — is plain text with no formatting toolbar and no markdown, so there's no bold button. The workaround the whole creator economy uses is Unicode bold: type your line, convert it to bold Unicode characters (𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗱) in a generator, then paste it back and the emphasis sticks, because the style is baked into the characters themselves. Bold only the hook — the part that shows before the “…see more” cut-off — to earn the click, and keep the rest plain so the post stays skimmable. Two caveats matter: Unicode text isn't read by LinkedIn's search and is announced poorly by screen readers, so never bold the keywords, names or hashtags you want found or read aloud. For true rich text (headings, lists), use LinkedIn's separate 'Write article' editor instead.

Format a LinkedIn post

Instagram's native composer collapses the line breaks you type, which is why captions paste in as one dense block — it's worst when you post from the web or through some schedulers. The reliable fix is to compose the caption with the spacing you want and paste it back with the breaks preserved, rather than relying on invisible-character hacks (blank Unicode characters can break Instagram's search and are read poorly by screen readers). Write the caption with your intended breaks, generate the spaced version, and paste it into the caption field. Put your strongest hook on line one, since that's the part that shows before the 'more' cut-off in the feed. Keep paragraphs short — two or three lines — so the caption stays skimmable on a phone, where almost everyone reads it.

Open the line-break tool

Yes — WhatsApp is the exception among messaging and social apps because it has its own built-in markup that it renders for everyone. Wrap text in *asterisks* for bold, _underscores_ for italic, ~tildes~ for strikethrough, and triple backticks for monospace; the symbols disappear and the styling shows. So you usually don't need Unicode characters on WhatsApp at all. Reach for a Unicode formatter only when you want a style WhatsApp's markdown doesn't cover — small caps or script for a Status, say — or when you're writing one message to post across several apps that don't share WhatsApp's syntax (Instagram, X and Threads strip these symbols and show them literally). For everyday bold and italic inside WhatsApp itself, the native markup is the better and more accessible choice.

Format for WhatsApp

Because that editor is plain text and strips anything it doesn't parse. Markdown (*bold*), HTML tags and rich-text styling only render where the platform explicitly supports them — paste them into Instagram, X/Twitter or a LinkedIn post and you see the raw asterisks, or nothing at all, because those boxes have no formatting engine. Unicode styling works differently: the bold or italic look is baked into each character (a Unicode bold 'A' is its own code point), so it survives any plain-text field and travels with a copy-paste. That's the whole reason Unicode 'fancy text' formatters exist. The trade-off is accessibility — because they aren't ordinary letters, screen readers can mis-read them and in-app search may not match them — so use Unicode for short emphasis, not for body copy or anything that must be searchable.

Generate paste-proof styles

Related in this series

See all in How-to format

Explore the topic cluster

More tools and guides across this topic cluster.

Get the next post.

Craft notes on writing for the internet. One short email, every other week. No spam.

Keep reading